Pages

Jump to bottom

8 comments

1 HappyWarrior  Fri, Aug 12, 2011 12:39:07pm

The Apartheid stuff doesn’t shock me. Reagan had no problem at all with the Apartheid regime in South Africa so why would it shock me that Falwell did. Now, the thing about bosses and employees that does especially the slavery verse and the fact that it was written in 19 frigging 90.

2 Bulworth  Fri, Aug 12, 2011 1:40:29pm

The Dirty Feckin Hippies wanted to end Apartheid. Why did they hate America?

/

3 Eclectic Cyborg  Fri, Aug 12, 2011 2:24:13pm

And this is exactly, EXACTLY the kind of social engineering and culture reformation they constantly accuse the Left of.

4 Atlas Fails  Fri, Aug 12, 2011 2:42:03pm

Good ol’ fashioned family values!

///

5 HappyWarrior  Fri, Aug 12, 2011 2:44:34pm

re: #3 dragonfire1981

And this is exactly, EXACTLY the kind of social engineering and culture reformation they constantly accuse the Left of.

Silly, it’s okay when social conservatives do it. When social liberals want people to be tolerant of gays and lesbians, then they’re trampling on Jesus Christ.

6 jaunte  Fri, Aug 12, 2011 3:14:31pm

A classic.

…in honor of Rick Perry’s recent prayer rally in Houston, a 1985 campaign flyer from the “Straight Slate” of candidates for Mayor and City Council, warning that Houston “has become the Southwest capital for homosexuality and pornography” and insisting that “We must not allow Houston to become another San Francisco!” (Current Houston Mayor Annise Parker, who was sworn in last year, is a lesbian who parents three children with her partner.)


Image: StraightSlateFlyer.jpg

7 SanFranciscoZionist  Sat, Aug 13, 2011 12:06:41am

re: #1 HappyWarrior

The Apartheid stuff doesn’t shock me. Reagan had no problem at all with the Apartheid regime in South Africa so why would it shock me that Falwell did. Now, the thing about bosses and employees that does especially the slavery verse and the fact that it was written in 19 frigging 90.

It does say something about their mindset that they consider the relationship between a free person and his or her employer to be identical to that of a slave and his or her owner, and believe this is a good thing. Do they believe, for example, that an employee is not free to quit? That they should work for minimal room and board? That they are obligated to let the employer rape their spouse? This gets very strange very fast.

I would also note that this would have made no sense to Christians of the period during which Paul (that’s Paul, right) wrote, since they would have fully understood the distinction between a free employee and a slave. And while I’m not gonna wade in too deep, since I don’t know enough about the history of the Greek scriptures, I suspect that verse may have had some significance or purpose besides telling people to stay in line.

8 SanFranciscoZionist  Sat, Aug 13, 2011 12:12:22am

Timothy makes explicit what I suspect was part of the point: All who are under the yoke of slavery should consider their masters worthy of full respect, so that God’s name and our teaching may not be slandered.

Don’t give folks the idea that the Christians are going to cause slave uprisings and stuff, folks. Act cool.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh