Pages

Jump to bottom

6 comments

1 nines09  Sun, Nov 6, 2011 9:37:14am
2 calochortus  Sun, Nov 6, 2011 11:02:36am

re: #1 nines09

It can't happen here either

For convenience, the relevant passage is:

In the late 1960s toxic waste injected into hazardous waste disposal wells at Rocky Flats, near Denver apparently caused earthquakes to occur in a previously earthquake quiet area. The focal depths of the quakes ranged between 4 and 8 km, just below the 3.8 km-deep wells.

It's not really news to geologists...

3 nines09  Sun, Nov 6, 2011 11:16:02am

re: #2 calochortus

Yep. Harmless practice. Got to defund the EPA so they can really screw the public. Pesky laws keeping the air and water clean? Who needs them? One day they will ride away and we will be left to pick up the tab.

4 Decatur Deb  Sun, Nov 6, 2011 12:00:23pm

re: #2 calochortus

It can't happen here either

For convenience, the relevant passage is:

It's not really news to geologists...

That was an Army operation. We do have an earthquake weapon.

5 jvic  Sun, Nov 6, 2011 1:26:30pm

1. Here is a news report on the Lancashire quakes; it links to a company-sponsored technical analysis.

2. Geologist Austin Holland's report on the Oklahoma quakes is here. A discussion of the Holland report is here. The abstract to the Shapiro et al paper linked by Holland is here; a related Shapiro abstract is here; Shaprio's research area is described here.

3. The relation between fracking and seismicity is an established research topic. To date a definitive showstopper has not been identified. That doesn't mean research should stop; on the contrary, research and monitoring should intensify as the use of fracking expands.

Unfortunately, as society's (or an institution's) stake in a technology grows, so does resistance to alteration of the risk-benefit-cost trade-off profile. Nature will not make allowances if we are incapable of collective intellectual honesty.

4. I'm not commenting about potential contamination of drinking water.

6 jvic  Sun, Nov 6, 2011 2:48:58pm

From the Oklahoma Geological Survey:

Yes the number of earthquakes felt in 2009 and 2010 are unusual. The frequency of earthquakes has temporarily increased in Oklahoma, these earthquakes do not appear to be inconsistent with what might be called normal seismicity for Oklahoma.

I'd like to see a second opinion, preferably from experts who do not have a stake in the controversy. (NB: I am not making an insinuation about the OGS; I am advocating due diligence.)


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh