Pages

13 comments

Jump to bottom
1 wheat-dogghazi  Tue, Nov 27, 2012 5:16:10am

Words fail me. The sister in this family might be the only decent person in the bunch.

2 wrenchwench  Tue, Nov 27, 2012 9:03:58am

re: #1 wheat-dogghazi

Words fail me. The sister in this family might be the only decent person in the bunch.

Makes me wonder what she has endured.

3 Jolo5309  Tue, Nov 27, 2012 9:21:27am

Jesus fuck, what kind of sick bastards do this?

Oh right, I forgot, the religious ones.

4 CuriousLurker  Tue, Nov 27, 2012 9:45:23am

Yeah, because there's no such thing as sick atheist bastards. Guys like Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc. were all...oh, wait. //

5 Jolo5309  Tue, Nov 27, 2012 11:48:43am

re: #4 CuriousLurker

Yeah, because there's no such thing as sick atheist bastards. Guys like Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc. were all...oh, wait. //

Seriously? You can argue that Mao, Pol Pot and Stalin did what they did in the name of atheism?

Go ahead, I will wait.

6 CuriousLurker  Tue, Nov 27, 2012 11:53:03am

re: #5 Jolo5309

Seriously? You can argue that Mao, Pol Pot and Stalin did what they did in the name of atheism?

Go ahead, I will wait.

Did I say they did it in the name of atheism? Please point out where.

Go ahead, I will wait.

7 Obdicut  Tue, Nov 27, 2012 2:24:03pm

re: #6 CuriousLurker

It's really a poor time to bring up those dudes. There really is violence against gay people inspired by religious fervor. It's not all religious people, but almost all of the dominant religions in the world have something against gay people. It's great that there are liberal religious people who fight back against that, but it is good to acknowledge, especially after a horrific attack like this, that many religions preach intolerance, and intolerance leads to violence.

8 goddamnedfrank  Tue, Nov 27, 2012 3:09:34pm

re: #6 CuriousLurker

Did I say they did it in the name of atheism? Please point out where.

Go ahead, I will wait.

I figure you put the sarc tags there for a reason.

9 CuriousLurker  Tue, Nov 27, 2012 3:29:59pm

re: #7 Obdicut

It's really a poor time to bring up those dudes. There really is violence against gay people inspired by religious fervor. It's not all religious people, but almost all of the dominant religions in the world have something against gay people. It's great that there are liberal religious people who fight back against that, but it is good to acknowledge, especially after a horrific attack like this, that many religions preach intolerance, and intolerance leads to violence.

I know you're right, but sometimes I get sick & tired of the atheists who seem to feel the need to snipe at religion and/or religious people at every opportunity (like my Thanksgiving story) and this was one of those times.

I've consistently spoken out against intolerance & violence countless times; anyone who's been here any length of time knows that, and Jolo has been here longer than I. I up-dinged the Page because I agreed with Frank and was going to leave a comment, then I saw Jolo's comment and I *twitched* because he made it sound like only religious people could produce such "sick bastards". That's simply not true. That was my point, albeit perhaps not made at the most opportune time.

I prolly shouldn't comment before I've had my 2nd cup of coffee in the morning as that's when I tend to be at my twitchiest and let people who I'd otherwise ignore get under my skin.

10 Obdicut  Tue, Nov 27, 2012 3:45:43pm

re: #9 CuriousLurker

I know you're right, but sometimes I get sick & tired of the atheists who seem to feel the need to snipe at religion and/or religious people at every opportunity (like my Thanksgiving story) and this was one of those times.

Every day, many people are hurt and killed in the name of religion. It appears as a perversion of religion to you, but to many of these people it is an honest, if terrible, expression of their faith. This story is not some story where religion had to be crowbarred in.

I've consistently spoken out against intolerance & violence countless times; anyone who's been here any length of time knows that, and Jolo has been here longer than I.

However, you're a rarity among devout people. Sadly, the majority of Muslims in many countries are extremely intolerant of homosexuality. So are the majority of Catholics, Lutherans, Baptists, etc. etc. I respect your right to follow your religion, and especially your desire to liberalize it, but in identifying with a larger group you have to, in some way, shoulder responsibility for the dominant attitudes of that group. I know of very few LBGT-friendly Muslim groups in the US. Far more are intolerant of homosexuality.

then I saw Jolo's comment and I *twitched* because he made it sound like only religious people could produce such "sick bastards". That's simply not true. That was my point, albeit perhaps not made at the most opportune time.

See, I thought he was saying that only the religious bastards do this sort of crime-- beat a woman because she is something that according to their religion is an abomination. Certainly, gay women get assaulted by homophobes for other reasons, and you can make an argument that it wasn't really religion in this case if you stretch it, but there are religious assholes who beat women, throw acid in their face, etc. for all sorts of things.

There are vanishingly few crimes inspired by atheism-- none of the people you mentioned count. There was a lot of anti-clericalism during the Terror. There have been other cases. But in general, crimes committed in the name of God by people who, if we're honest, actually are religiously devout, vastly outweighs those committed by atheists in the name of atheism, even taking the respective proportions of the population into account. This is because it is far, far easier to have a radicalized form of religion than a radicalized view of skeptical philosophy.

I prolly shouldn't comment before I've had my 2nd cup of coffee in the morning as that's when I tend to be at my twitchiest and let people who I'd otherwise ignore get under my skin.

I want to make sure you understand what I'm saying. I think I'm among the most tolerant of atheists, and I know that change must come slow to trees as old as Islam, Christianity, and Judaism, but god damn it it some days burns me up to hell that in the twenty-first century, in the US, we still have people being murdered because someone's 'god' told them to. The concept of god, of revealed truth, of ineffability, is a dangerous one. It is far too easy, I feel, for the moderate religious to say "Well, my religion is nothing like that" and look away from the problem. The vast majority of the world's religions remain bigoted, and actively work to impede human rights for gay people.

And in no case is this even something that's stressed in the texts. It is a very chosen, and often, it seems to me, a very cynical approach.

11 CuriousLurker  Tue, Nov 27, 2012 4:39:56pm

re: #10 Obdicut

Every day, many people are hurt and killed in the name of religion. It appears as a perversion of religion to you, but to many of these people it is an honest, if terrible, expression of their faith. This story is not some story where religion had to be crowbarred in.

I know, but I'm human. I twitch. Twitching isn't about being rational, and sometimes I'm not.

However, you're a rarity among devout people. Sadly, the majority of Muslims in many countries are extremely intolerant of homosexuality. So are the majority of Catholics, Lutherans, Baptists, etc. etc. I respect your right to follow your religion, and especially your desire to liberalize it, but in identifying with a larger group you have to, in some way, shoulder responsibility for the dominant attitudes of that group. I know of very few LBGT-friendly Muslim groups in the US. Far more are intolerant of homosexuality.

I'm not sure I agree with the bolded part. I need to think about it some more.

There are vanishingly few crimes inspired by atheism-- none of the people you mentioned count. There was a lot of anti-clericalism during the Terror. There have been other cases. But in general, crimes committed in the name of God by people who, if we're honest, actually are religiously devout, vastly outweighs those committed by atheists in the name of atheism, even taking the respective proportions of the population into account. This is because it is far, far easier to have a radicalized form of religion than a radicalized view of skeptical philosophy.

You're correct, of course, but my point was not that the things I mentioned were inspired by atheism, but rather that many horrible, violent things have been perpetrated by atheists despite their lack of religious inspiration. Yeah, I know, poor logic/comparison. I knew that as I was typing it and figured I'd get called on it, but I went ahead and posted it anyway because I was annoyed and it made me feel better (temporarily).

I want to make sure you understand what I'm saying. I think I'm among the most tolerant of atheists, and I know that change must come slow to trees as old as Islam, Christianity, and Judaism, but god damn it it some days burns me up to hell that in the twenty-first century, in the US, we still have people being murdered because someone's 'god' told them to. The concept of god, of revealed truth, of ineffability, is a dangerous one. It is far too easy, I feel, for the moderate religious to say "Well, my religion is nothing like that" and look away from the problem. The vast majority of the world's religions remain bigoted, and actively work to impede human rights for gay people.

And in no case is this even something that's stressed in the texts. It is a very chosen, and often, it seems to me, a very cynical approach.

I think understand what you're saying now. Speaking of bigotry, I ran across some pretty serious anti-Semitism a couple of weeks ago from a fellow Muslim. This was an educated, professional person, in fact a person who I was dealing with in their professional capacity. I was more than a little taken aback that this individual felt so comfortable expressing such sentiments in that setting. The assumption seemed to be that I'd agree simply because we were both Muslim.

12 Obdicut  Wed, Nov 28, 2012 2:58:36am

re: #11 CuriousLurker

I'm not sure I agree with the bolded part. I need to think about it some more.

I know the instinct is to reject it, but I hope you will think about it some more. It's the "What does it mean to be an X?" question. Does me being American mean that I have responsibility for the US's actions? Most would say a definite yes-- I live here, I vote, I pay taxes. That doesn't mean I can't honestly say I oppose those actions-- there are many things the US does I oppose. But my opposition to them shows my responsibility for them. I agitate for legislation to correct prison conditions, I vote for those who will enact policies I do agree with, etc. etc.

Are you, as a Muslim, responsible for the actions of other Muslims? No, definitely not-- but what does it mean for you to be a Muslim, and for them to be Muslims as well? You can say that the fanatics are not really Muslims, but then we're in the very tricky area of warring ideas of apostacy, dressed in the garb of the No True Scotsman. The sad truth is that interviews with religious fanatics tend to show sincerity: they really are highly devout, often deeply troubled in their religious relationship but have sincerity.

The problem with organized religion is that it is organized: by laying claim to the tradition, bound by text and historical personages and all the rest, I feel that, like stating your allegiance with anything else, you then take on some responsibility. For you, as a highly liberal Muslim, that responsibility is trying to liberalize Islam. Not exactly small potatoes, but neither is trying to get prison conditions in the US fixed. I'm not saying you bear responsibility and therefore you should be blamed or punished, I'm saying that by being Muslim, by being part of any religion, someone shoulders the responsibility of doing what they can to move that group in the right direction.

You're correct, of course, but my point was not that the things I mentioned were inspired by atheism, but rather that many horrible, violent things have been perpetrated by atheists despite their lack of religious inspiration. Yeah, I know, poor logic/comparison. I knew that as I was typing it and figured I'd get called on it, but I went ahead and posted it anyway because I was annoyed and it made me feel better (temporarily).

How deeply human of you, you terrible person you.

Speaking of bigotry, I ran across some pretty serious anti-Semitism a couple of weeks ago from a fellow Muslim. This was an educated, professional person, in fact a person who I was dealing with in their professional capacity. I was more than a little taken aback that this individual felt so comfortable expressing such sentiments in that setting. The assumption seemed to be that I'd agree simply because we were both Muslim.

Yes, it's that normalization of things that I'm talking about. Homophobia is normalized in almost all major religions. Even if it's considered rude to talk about how disgusting 'faggots' are and how much you hate them, it's considered fine to assert gays make worse parents than straight people, or argue that gay relationships aren't the same so they shouldn't be called marriage, or, simply, assert that god thinks gays live in constant sin. And from that intolerance springs actual harm to gay people, from the very literal prevention of their civil rights to the harm visited on this poor girl.

To sum it up: Most religion is scary to the outsider like myself looking in because, at the root of it, it's an assertion that they know what god wants and what he hates. They know what 'sin' is, not based on philosophy or decency, but on revealed truth. This is why it's so hard to liberalize religion: you have to either admit that much of what the religion believed was revealed truth wasn't, or you have to come up with a brand-spanking new religious revealed truth.

13 CuriousLurker  Wed, Nov 28, 2012 10:37:30am

re: #12 Obdicut

I know the instinct is to reject it, but I hope you will think about it some more. It's the "What does it mean to be an X?" question. Does me being American mean that I have responsibility for the US's actions? Most would say a definite yes-- I live here, I vote, I pay taxes. That doesn't mean I can't honestly say I oppose those actions-- there are many things the US does I oppose. But my opposition to them shows my responsibility for them. I agitate for legislation to correct prison conditions, I vote for those who will enact policies I do agree with, etc. etc.

Are you, as a Muslim, responsible for the actions of other Muslims? No, definitely not-- but what does it mean for you to be a Muslim, and for them to be Muslims as well? You can say that the fanatics are not really Muslims, but then we're in the very tricky area of warring ideas of apostacy, dressed in the garb of the No True Scotsman. The sad truth is that interviews with religious fanatics tend to show sincerity: they really are highly devout, often deeply troubled in their religious relationship but have sincerity.

The problem with organized religion is that it is organized: by laying claim to the tradition, bound by text and historical personages and all the rest, I feel that, like stating your allegiance with anything else, you then take on some responsibility. For you, as a highly liberal Muslim, that responsibility is trying to liberalize Islam. Not exactly small potatoes, but neither is trying to get prison conditions in the US fixed. I'm not saying you bear responsibility and therefore you should be blamed or punished, I'm saying that by being Muslim, by being part of any religion, someone shoulders the responsibility of doing what they can to move that group in the right direction.

Okay, I see what you're saying now. It makes sense now. Thanks for always taking the time to discuss things calmly and in detail, minus any snark. ;)


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

TwitterFacebook

Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing!
For about 33 cents a day (per month) or 22 cents a day (per year), our subscription option turns off all advertisements at LGF!
Read more...

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form
LGF Pages

This button leads to the main index of LGF Pages, our user-submitted articles. You can post your own LGF Pages simply by registering a free account with us.

Create a Page

This is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.

Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.

Last updated: 2014-03-07 2:19 pm PST

LGF User's Guide
Recent Pages
Randall Gross
San Diego Comic Con 2014 (SDCC) Cosplay Music Video
To celebrate us recently hitting 100,000 Subscribers & 100 videos make sure you watch to the end for a little give away competition. To enter you must tweet us who you would like to see Nathan Fillion & Adam ...

11 hours, 10 minutes ago
Views: 97 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
CriticalDragon1177
Skepchick - Food is for White Liberals What Sex Is For The Religious Right
An interesting commentary by Julia Burke, on the obsession some people on the far left have with food, and how it is similar to how some people on right feel about sex. Do you agree? Do you think the analogy ...

1 day, 15 hours ago
Views: 341 • Comments: 8
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 1
EiMitch
Cracked: 5 Reasons The Classic American Summer is Totally Dead
They could've called this article "Look at how 'supply-side' economics, anti-environmentalism, and all-around pro-oligarch legislation and ideology has destroyed some of the most iconic, classic Americana." cracked.com Oh, and gentrification-based laws are also robbing us of the classic ice-cream truck ...

1 day, 15 hours ago
Views: 229 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
_RememberTonyC
Qatar, Bergdahl, and Hamas
One thing we have learned in the current conflict is that Hamas has three main sponsors: Turkey, Iran, and Qatar. So when Bergdahl was released and the five taliban bigs were released into the "custody" of Qatar, we basically handed ...

2 days, 10 hours ago
Views: 195 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
Skip Intro
Outside Money Drives a Deluge of Political Ads
WASHINGTON -- An explosion of spending on political advertising on television -- set to break $2 billion in congressional races, with overall spots up nearly 70 percent since the 2010 midterm election -- is accelerating the rise of moneyed ...

3 days, 20 hours ago
Views: 236 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 4 • Rating: 3
Rightwingconspirator
Washington, D.C., Handgun Carry Ban Is Ruled Unconstitutional
I agree. Bans are not an option. Jurisdictions like DC will just have to deal with the fact that regulation is the path. Bans don't work. Bans are illegal and unwise. It's simple. we as a society have chosen to ...

4 days, 15 hours ago
Views: 567 • Comments: 95
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 6
Romantic Heretic
Preventing Poverty Not Allowed As A Goal for Charity
The Canada Revenue Agency (Canada's equivalent of the IRS) has told OXFAM Canada that it cannot list 'preventing poverty' as a goal, only 'alleviating' it. The reason is "Relieving poverty is charitable, but preventing it is not." This is just ...

6 days, 17 hours ago
Views: 538 • Comments: 12
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 5
FemNaziBitch
Safer Era Tests Wisdom of ‘Broken Windows’ Focus on Minor Crime
While the apparent chokehold fueled much of the initial public outcry, community leaders have begun asking whether focusing police officers so intently on such petty offenses makes sense in a city that is far different and far safer than ...

1 week ago
Views: 432 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Mentis Fugit
Frisson
Over at the quirky Riddled blog, I encountered this music video link. I have the album, but I had last listened long ago, and I had forgotten the lyrics. The lengthy, moody intro slowly drew me back thirty five years, ...

1 week, 2 days ago
Views: 298 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 0
BadExampleMan
The painful futility of war
This makes me furious. These men pledged their loyalty to their country and their country betrayed them. It treated them as disposable, throwing their lives away in a war that was premised on lies, that was chosen gleefully, and that ...

1 week, 4 days ago
Views: 484 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 1
 Frank says:

All right kiddies, we'll play "wipe-out" for you in a moment. -- Frank's comment to the crowd at a 1968 concert in Dallas, Tx