Pages

17 comments

Jump to bottom
1 HappyWarrior  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 11:41:34am

Fucking dick.

2 nines09  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 12:52:36pm

Ethics? What are they? You can almost hear the conversations that go on in "quiet rooms" these days. "Is it legal?" We'll, barely. " Is it ethical?" Hell no. "Fuck 'em." CEO 101. Tell me once again how they need tax cuts and no regulations. Fucking leeches. But I could go to jail for stealing a pack of cigarettes. When is enough, enough?

3 Holidays are Family Fun Time  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 1:07:55pm

It seems to be about doing what they want, when they want, why they want. Because they are the undiagnosed, but non-violent type, its ok.

*spit*

4 Destro  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 1:45:22pm

Poor salaried workers are clearly going to hell because they are poor and the rich execs are heaven's select because they are rich per Calvinist doctrine so why not exploit the already predestined damned?

5 EPR-radar  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 2:46:01pm

More blatant executive theft than usual.

For some time now, I've thought the Conrad Black case was amazing. Black managed to find a way to loot his company in a way that is illegal in the US. That takes real talent.

6 Buck  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 4:03:04pm

"essentially" admitted

and

"isn’t technically illegal"

I would add that using a pension fund as a personal bank account was invented by the Unions.

It doesn't sound like it was emptied. It doesn't even sound like the employee contributions were touched.

Anyway the only people who draw from it are former employees who have already retired.

We don't know if they will be able to continue to draw from it, or maybe it will be paid out to them.

7 Joanne  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 4:12:14pm

re: #6 Buck

IOW, Fuck a bunch of union thugs, eh? Because that's what I am hearing you say.

8 Buck  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 4:18:59pm

re: #7 Joanne

Then you are not listening. Not what I said at all.

9 EPR-radar  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 4:44:16pm

re: #6 Buck

Well, for a CEO to go to jail for looting a company in the US, it seems necessary for the CEO to put his plans in writing in triplicate: one copy for the local district attorney, one copy for the nearest major newspaper, and one copy for the most significant business rival.

The plan also needs to be blatant --- something like "I will personally steal everything that isn't nailed down, and bring a crowbar for the rest. What are you all going to do about it?".

So, "not technically" illegal in the original article is really a meaningless distinction.

10 Dark_Falcon  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 6:03:03pm

re: #6 Buck

I don't care what sort of people did it first, its still wrong.

11 cinesimon  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 6:22:59pm

re: #6 Buck

Buck, I'll let you in on a little something that you seem not to have grasped: Your dishonesty, false equivalences, inability to think critically - not to mention your seeming inability to grasp basic facts presented rather clearly - simply confirms once again that the now widespread stereotype of republicans as dishonest, brainless, childish fundamentalists who have no interest in engaging with society - is correct.

12 cinesimon  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 6:28:06pm

Ya gotta love the right wing standing up for this crook, by saying that 'hey! Hoffa did it too!'
For fuck's sake - Hoffa was a crook. He was assassinated. Many of his contemporaries were jailed, and rightly so. Yet his equivalent in the modern day is not jailed, but celebrated by a very small, incredibly very vocal group of increasingly unpatriotic Americans. People who in my opinion, would enjoy life much more if they were to move to Russia, where the elites there share republican values to a tee.

13 ProMayaLiberal  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 7:23:15pm

re: #10 Dark_Falcon

Speaking of which, how is this BS not illegal?

14 EPR-radar  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 7:26:53pm

re: #13 ProGunLiberal

Speaking of which, how is this BS not illegal?

The CEOs and their cronies/wannabes write the laws. As I said upthread, it takes real talent for a CEO in the US to find an illegal way to loot a company.

15 Kdizzle  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 9:27:15pm

re: #6 Buck

FFFFFFFUUUUUUCCCCCKKKKK YYYYYOOOOOUUUU.

16 Kdizzle  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 9:29:11pm

re: #12 cinesimon

He isn't Republican as far as I can tell. He's a Canadian who wants Canada to be more plutocratic.

There is a philo-Americanism thing going on.

17 RadicalModerate  Thu, Dec 13, 2012 10:46:38pm

re: #6 Buck

"essentially" admitted

and

"isn’t technically illegal"

I would add that using a pension fund as a personal bank account was invented by the Unions.

It doesn't sound like it was emptied. It doesn't even sound like the employee contributions were touched.

According to the WSJ article, that's EXACTLY what Hostess did with the pension plan. The "essentially" and "technically" parts were probably put in at the request of the legal department to cover for any possible inaccuracies.

The pension contributions were stopped in mid-2011, which means Hostess kept money designated for employee pension benefits for itself - and never repaid the money that accumulated over the course of a year that they owed to it. The ONLY reason that it wasn't against the law is because Hostess management took the money from a deferred pension plan versus taking it directly from the employees.

Here's the WSJ article paged at Yahoo, if you can't get past the paywall.

[Link: finance.yahoo.com...]

Hostess Brands Inc. said it used wages that were supposed to help fund employee pensions for the company's operations as it sank toward bankruptcy.

It isn't clear how many of the Irving, Texas, company's workers were affected by the move or how much money never wound up in their pension plans as promised.

After the company said in August 2011 that it would stop making pension contributions, the foregone wages weren't put toward the pension. Nor were they restored.
[...]
The maneuver probably doesn't violate federal law because the money Hostess failed to put into the pension didn't come directly from employees, experts said.

"It's what lawyers call betrayal without remedy," said James P. Baker, a partner at Baker & McKenzie LLP who specializes in employee benefits and isn't involved in the Hostess case. "It's sad, but that stuff does happen, unfortunately."


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

TwitterFacebook

Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing!
Take advantage of our yearly subscription, and save 50% off the normal subscription price! One-year ad-free subscriptions are just $59.95. Turn off all ads for a full year by subscribing now and save!
Read more...

► LGF Headlines

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Articles

  • Loading...

► Tweeted Pages

  • Loading...

► Top 10 Comments

  • Loading...

► Bottom Comments

  • Loading...

► Recent Comments

  • Loading...

► Tools/Info

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form
LGF Pages

This button leads to the main index of LGF Pages, our user-submitted articles. You can post your own LGF Pages simply by registering a free account with us.

Create a Page

This is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.

Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.

Last updated: 2015-03-17 11:42 am PDT

LGF User's Guide
Recent Pages
Thanos
Lone Modder’s Half-Life 2: Update Brings Modern Graphics to a Classic
As amazing as Half-Life 2 was when it was first released in 2004, time has not been kind to the original release's graphics, which can look a bit flat and dated compared to modern PC games. Enter Romanian modder ...

8 hours, 49 minutes ago
Views: 126 • Comments: 2
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
Fred72
Are conservatives anti-science?
Are conservatives anti-science? Spoiler: Conservatives aren't anti-science or pro-science. But, they are pro-common-sense. And once more scientists adopt common sense approach to science, they'll find that they have the support of conservative politicians - the people whose job it is ...

22 hours, 41 minutes ago
Views: 365 • Comments: 10
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
EiMitch
Cracked: 8 Things Vietnam War Movies Leave Out (By an Enemy Soldier)
cracked.com Once the fighting started, a lot of people died, well over a million on our side alone. For the war to continue, a constant stream of new fighters had to join up, and they didn't have the benefit of ...

2 days, 2 hours ago
Views: 503 • Comments: 4
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 7
Romantic Heretic
The Lavender Scare
Here is an interesting article on one of Tail Gunner Joe's sick witch hunts that has, unfortunately, been forgotten. I try not to feel schadenfreude of the fate of McCarthy's side kick, Ray Cohn, but I never succeed.

2 days, 9 hours ago
Views: 403 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
FemNaziBitch
Should Women ‘Man Up’ at the Office, or Does Office Culture Need to ‘Man Down’?
About the Graphic How should a woman try to get ahead in a male-dominated workplace? Perhaps the answer lies less on women "manning up" and more in how businesses value their employees. Many women confront this tension as they ...

3 days, 11 hours ago
Views: 540 • Comments: 1
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 1
William Barnett-Lewis
Orthopraxy Pt 2
If we accept the idea of Orthopraxy over Orthodoxy, then what does evangelism look like? What is the Witness of those who try to follow the Way of Christ Jesus? To evangelize is to spread the good news that we ...

3 days, 23 hours ago
Views: 455 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4
thecommodore
Eric Alterman: A Wake-Up Call for US Liberals
A short column in The Nation that is a must read. The primary difference between liberalism and conservatism, at least in theory, is that the latter is an ideology and the former isn't. Conservatism, as Milton Friedman argued, posits that ...

4 days, 7 hours ago
Views: 679 • Comments: 0
Tweets: 1 • Rating: 5
Great White Snark
The NSA Has Taken Over the Internet Backbone. We’re Suing to Get It Back.
Blow off Snowden all you like, but what was revealed to be true is still true. The NSA lacks oversight with power. FISA is already too much and now they casually exceed even that generous provision. The world first learned ...

6 days, 6 hours ago
Views: 723 • Comments: 9
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 4
Lumberhead
Lead Prosecutor Apologizes, Admits Mistakes in Glenn Ford Case
This is a powerful admission of culpability and I applaud his courage in making it. It really should be read in its entirety. Glenn Ford should be completely compensated to every extent possible because of the flaws of a system ...

1 week, 2 days ago
Views: 879 • Comments: 4
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 8
Dark_Falcon
Sarah Vine of the DM gets it wrong on teaching about rape.
Sarah Vine of the DM gets it wrong: SARAH VINE: Teaching 11-year-olds about rape is a form of child abuse The problem with this country, I've come to realise, is that it treats adults like children and children like adults. ...

2 weeks, 3 days ago
Views: 1,369 • Comments: 6
Tweets: 0 • Rating: 9
 Frank says:

Anything played wrong twice in a row is the beginning of an arrangement.