Pages

Jump to bottom

3 comments

1 Kruk  Mon, Oct 14, 2013 4:24:20am

I hope my fellow Lizards won’t mind a bit of shameless self promotion. The topic of how different countries pay for medicines (and how those decisions impact patients) has been the focus of my professional life for the last few years. After a lot of hard graft, I received my doctorate in August.

There are a few points I’d like to make. First, there are always tradeoffs, but the outcomes are very much a result of the choices a country makes. My home country of New Zealand, for instance, has nationwide pharmaceutical coverage, low patient co-payments (typically NZ $5 per three month supply of medicines, with a cap of $100 per family per year), and good control of national pharmaceutical spending. The trade-off is that we have fewer and older publicly funded medicines than a lot of other countries.

If we take the asthma medicines mentioned in the NYT article as an example, any NZ resident who needed them would get them for the minimum co-payment. However, if a breakthrough new drug became available in the US, it could be a decade before we funded it. (We also don’t have a much of a private insurance market for pharmaceuticals, though people do have private insurance for hospital and specialist costs if they want an alternative to the public system). Essentially, if you want something that’s not on the publicly funded list, you would pay the full price yourself.

The other point I’d like to make is that my advisors and I searched long and hard for a US comparator to the systems that existed in New Zealand, Australia and the UK. In the end, the closest match we found was the Department of Veterans Affairs National Formulary. Even then, the thesis examiners asked me to italicise all tables referring to the US, to highlight the fact that the US system was very, very different from any of the others.

2 FemNaziBitch  Mon, Oct 14, 2013 7:25:17am

re: #1 Kruk

I hope my fellow Lizards won’t mind a bit of shameless self promotion. The topic of how different countries pay for medicines (and how those decisions impact patients) has been the focus of my professional life for the last few years. After a lot of hard graft, I received my doctorate in August.

There are a few points I’d like to make. First, there are always tradeoffs, but the outcomes are very much a result of the choices a country makes. My home country of New Zealand, for instance, has nationwide pharmaceutical coverage, low patient co-payments (typically NZ $5 per three month supply of medicines, with a cap of $100 per family per year), and good control of national pharmaceutical spending. The trade-off is that we have fewer and older publicly funded medicines than a lot of other countries.

If we take the asthma medicines mentioned in the NYT article as an example, any NZ resident who needed them would get them for the minimum co-payment. However, if a breakthrough new drug became available in the US, it could be a decade before we funded it. (We also don’t have a much of a private insurance market for pharmaceuticals, though people do have private insurance for hospital and specialist costs if they want an alternative to the public system). Essentially, if you want something that’s not on the publicly funded list, you would pay the full price yourself.

The other point I’d like to make is that my advisors and I searched long and hard for a US comparator to the systems that existed in New Zealand, Australia and the UK. In the end, the closest match we found was the Department of Veterans Affairs National Formulary. Even then, the thesis examiners asked me to italicise all tables referring to the US, to highlight the fact that the US system was very, very different from any of the others.

I find it interesting that you used a US comparator. I have to wonder if the deck is stacked in favor of the US? How, and why? There are very, very smart scientists in other countries —are none of them making break-thru drugs that would challenge the healthcare system in their own countries?

3 Kruk  Mon, Oct 14, 2013 1:40:57pm

We did a four way comparison: New Zealand, Australia, the UK and US for licensing, and PHARMAC (New Zealand), the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme or PBS (Australia), the NHS (UK) and the Veterans system (US) for funding.

(It was actually a lot of permutations, as each country and funding system had to be compared against each of the others, plus the licensing and funding within each country had to be compared. We also had to repeat that for every factor we examined like number, age and type).

We wanted the US in the comparison both because it is the largest spender per capita on pharmaceuticals, and also the biggest source of new drugs. There *were* a lot of questions (both from the thesis examiners and journal reviewers/correspondents when we published) whether it was appropriate to include the US because it was so different. Luckily, they seemed happy with my defence of that choice.

PS: If any Lizards are interested, please do contact me my by LGF e-mail. I’d be happy to send you a link to the dissertation, plus the abstracts of the resulting papers.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh
Best of April 2024 Nothing new here but these are a look back at the a few good images from the past month. Despite the weather, I was quite pleased with several of them. These were taken with older lenses (made from the ...
William Lewis
Yesterday
Views: 126 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 4
Texas County at Center of Border Fight Is Overwhelmed by Migrant Deaths EAGLE PASS, Tex. - The undertaker lighted a cigarette and held it between his latex-gloved fingers as he stood over the bloated body bag lying in the bed of his battered pickup truck. The woman had been fished out ...
Cheechako
3 weeks ago
Views: 387 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1