Pages

Jump to bottom

3 comments

1 majii  Aug 12, 2014 5:17:13pm

I think that even if voters had known about Brownback’s RW economic experiment, they would have voted for him anyway. When Nathan Deal (R) left the House in 2010 to avoid being charged with ethics violations, he came to GA, ran for the governorship and won. Voters were made aware that he was in debt for over $1Million and that his ethics were questionable, but they didn’t care. Their major reason for voting for him in spite of knowing that he wasn’t what he portrayed himself to be was that, “GA is a conservative state.” It has recently come to light that Deal’s ethics problems followed him right into the GA Governor’s Mansion. So far, we, the taxpayers, have paid almost $ 4 Million because of state employees filing ethics claims against him. He’s running for re-election in November, and although GA has lost ground in healthcare, the economic-well-being of the lower and middle classes, and in jobs and education, I think he stands a pretty decent chance of being re-elected because many here don’t vote in their own interests but on the basis of political affiliation. When their politicians don’t measure up, they blame it on the federal government. Since 2009, they’ve been blaming RW politicians’ failures on President Obama. When it became better known that Brownback and his RW buddies in the KS legislature had driven the state’s economy into a deep chasm, he blamed the president.

2 lostlakehiker  Aug 12, 2014 5:38:35pm

Well, if the governor, whoever the governor was at the time of the offense, is at fault [clearly the point of the article was to suggest as much] then by that rule—-?

The root cause of the securities fraud would likely have been that the state was spending money like water and it didn’t have it. Who could have been behind that?

3 Randall Gross  Aug 12, 2014 5:49:55pm

re: #2 lostlakehiker

Well, if the governor, whoever the governor was at the time of the offense, is at fault [clearly the point of the article was to suggest as much] then by that rule—-?

The root cause of the securities fraud would likely have been that the state was spending money like water and it didn’t have it. Who could have been behind that?

The Governorship back then was split between Sebellius / Parkinson, with Parkinson in the seat at the time I think. However the GOP had total deadlock on both the Senate and House with abilities to easily over ride vetos, so if too much was being spent, it was the GOP calling the shots on the budget.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh