Pages

Jump to bottom

8 comments

1 KerFuFFler  Oct 18, 2014 4:34:16pm

Un-fucking-believable! Darren Wilson is getting away with shooting an unarmed black kid who was running away because he was “in fear for his life,” but an actual victim of violent crime gets charged with 1st degree murder for killing her rapist. Too many people bend over backwards in their thinking to support white men in law enforcement when all the facts are clearly against them.

This article was from 2002, so I wonder what the outcome was.

2 KerFuFFler  Oct 18, 2014 5:34:50pm

Whoops, I did not see that it was a 2002 article in MS about events in the ‘70’s! I was a little kid then——-no wonder I did not hear about it at the time.

3 Indepublicrat  Oct 18, 2014 7:38:50pm

According to Wikipedia, this incident took place in 1974. The linked article seems to have been written in 1975, before the outcome of Little’s trial was known, and republished in 2002. The trial focused national attention on the issues of a woman’s right to defend herself from rape, the validity of capital punishment racial and sexual inequality in the criminal justice system, and the rights of prisoners in general. It took the jury less than an hour and a half to find Joan Little not guilty.

Although Little received a not guilty verdict, she still had to go back to prison to serve out the remainder of her existing sentence for breaking and entering. Her prison term was extended after another escape, but she was released on parole in 1979.

4 Dark_Falcon  Oct 18, 2014 9:15:16pm

re: #3 Indepublicrat

Things have changed and these days the law is a great deal clearer about a woman’s right to self-defense. But many on the left ended up not being happy about that, since it was conservatives who by and large pushed to expand and clarify self-defense law, with gun rights being a main reason for the change.

5 Dark_Falcon  Oct 18, 2014 9:20:50pm

Moreover, it should be pointed out that the writer of that article, Angela Davis, was and remains a Communist (in her case as an open member of the Communist Party USA) whose writing almost always depicted the United States in a highly negative light.

6 palomino  Oct 18, 2014 11:36:34pm

re: #5 Dark_Falcon

Moreover, it should be pointed out that the writer of that article, Angela Davis, was and remains a Communist (in her case as an open member of the Communist Party USA) whose writing almost always depicted the United States in a highly negative light.

Instead of knee jerk defensive patriotism, why don’t you try imagining what it would be like to be Angela Davis? Born in Alabama before the end of WWII; a second class citizen due to her gender and race. These are things people like you and me can only imagine, but we should try anyway.

Now ask if she might have valid reasons for seeing the US in a more critical light than someone like you.

Calling her a commie—in this context—is a cheap dodge, a way to dismiss her and thus her arguments without having to actually engage in anything substantive.

7 Islamo-Masonic Conspirator  Oct 19, 2014 4:35:58am

It’s sort of interesting to see how this plays out in a patriarchal and pretty racist society when some of the factors are “reversed”.

In Russia there was the notorious Ivannikova case. Aleksandra Ivannikova killed a taxi driver Sergey Bagdasaryan, who apparently tried to rape her. The Russian state accused her of going over the so-called “self-defence” limits and initially she was found guilty.

But there was a twist - Bagdasaryan was not ethnically Russian, so the Russian nationalists, who are otherwise, of course, as patriarchal and misogynist as you can imagine, circled the wagons around her and after some wrangling she was set free.

ru.wikipedia.org

Given all the political factors, I frankly have no idea as to the truth of the matter. But had that been an ethnically Russian taxi driver, I’m pretty sure Ivannikova’s sentence would not have been overturned.

8 FemNaziBitch  Oct 19, 2014 8:15:26am

There have a number of articles recently all revolving around the same central (although unamed) theme. Basically, do women have the right to self-defense?

The Marissa Alexander case being the first that comes to mind. I’ve posted this article, Carceral Feminism, and others.

Having heard personal stories from survivors of DV, I know that if a woman defends herself and wins, and ends-up in court it is her word against his. Unless he has a history of violence, or has violated a protection order, she has a hard time proving she was defending herself.

Men are not always the perpetrators. There has been a concerted effort to increase awareness and get male victims of both DV and SA to seek help.

I actually feel for the first responders, they have a tough job.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh