The Danger of License Plate Readers in Post-Roe America
I can’t wrap my head around the morality or constitutionality of prosecuting a woman for traveling to where abortion is legal. With that said…
“Plain view” is a fair standard for police to observe us for criminals and violations, especially felonies. But let’s be honest. Add up the following and ponder the power. Digital imaging. Facial recognition. Fast internet. Databases of license plates seen. Those databases provide a step-by-step map of our travels. No warrant is needed.
We have to ask ourselves what is rightly enforceable with this power. We must reconsider our right to travel to any location for what’s legal at the destination and perhaps not at home. We define democracy and our personal rights with these decisions.
Currently, nine states have almost entirely banned abortion, and more are expected to follow suit. Many Republican lawmakers in these states are discussing the possibility of preventing people from traveling across state lines to obtain an abortion. If such plans are enacted and withstand legal scrutiny, one of the key technologies that could be deployed to track people trying to cross state lines is automated license plate readers (ALPRs). They’re employed heavily by police forces across the US, but they’re also used by private actors.
ALPRs are cameras that are mounted on street poles, overpasses, and elsewhere that can identify and capture license plate numbers on passing cars for the purpose of issuing speeding tickets and tolls, locating stolen cars, and more. State and local police maintain databases of captured license plates and frequently use those databases in criminal investigations.
The police have access to not only license plate data collected by their own ALPRs but also data gathered by private companies. Firms like Flock Safety and Motorola Solutions have their own networks of ALPRs that are mounted to the vehicles of private companies and organizations they work with, such as car repossession outfits. Flock, for instance, claims it’s collecting license plate data in roughly 1,500 cities and can capture data from over a billion vehicles every month.
More: The danger of license plate readers in post-Roe America