re: #9 Political Atheist

Yes with some provisions.
I am assuming he bought them legally, and moved to DC and did not register them as a technical violation of a city ordinance. Maybe (not at all sure) because he could not have had them before at all and was violating the unconstitutional ban. I assume no other legal errors are present, whatever the details.

Wow. So you really just don’t give a shit about the way that a city wants to regulate guns. A ‘technical violation’.

Since a sincere media personality got off with a warning about a violation of the magazine ban why not $1 a gun? It’s more than a warning, still dings his record for future reference and reflects the consequences of his unregistered possession. No negative consequences, and a very positive one.

Again. You just really don’t respect DC”s gun laws at all.

Rewarding vigilantism to that degree is dangerous. Come on, the message sent is that if you’ve got unregistered guns, just find a way to use them positively and you’ll get a free pass.