re: #90 HappyWarrior

I personally think it’s beyond foolish to use a 2000 year old Holy Book for means of deciding secular law especially one full of contradictions like the Bible.

And that is not the approach Rudd took.

What Rudd did was execute a fallacy - the No True Christian fallacy.

Rudd and that pastor are arguing over who is the True Christian.

Like with President Obama, Rudd doesn’t want to state the obvious - because politically, and they are politicians, they still have to cling to the general religious sentiment.