re: #91 Gus 802

How’s that for derangement no? I mean, you’re one of our conservative members. Of course the big difference is that you’re sane as opposed to insane. Meh, fuck ‘em. They’re going to be doing their little circle jerk routine over at DoD for a long time.

When it comes to old-style stalking, the standard advice I’ve heard from those in law enforcement is to document every instance of unwanted contact and harassment, but not engage the stalker in any way (i.e. after giving them a clear, unambiguous, “do not contact me ever again” statement, say nothing more - if they call, hang up immediately, if they write/email, don’t respond - just document the communications for law enforcement purposes).

When it comes to cyberstalking, I’m not entirely sure how to modify that advice - though I confess to finding the posts entertaining at times, generally, I feel it’s not a good idea to engage the stalkers here - only eggs them on, and makes them feel they still have a “mutual” relationship with LGF. But ignore them completely? If they’re making threats, planning something seriously disruptive, or actively spamming other sites with things such as nic-jacking, cyber-vandalism, etc, I do think that should be documented in case the US ever gets a cyberstalking law with teeth.