re: #80 Peter_P3

Are you serious?

Ok it is all in his head then. He is making it up!

Let me summarize this:

1. A mass murderer sets of a bomb in central Oslo, and then procedes to shoot and kill dozens of unarmed youth.
2. The mass murderer releases a manifesto, where large swaths of the manifesto is taken directly from Fjordman’s essays. Fjordman is singled out as a source of inspiration, by the mass murderer himself.
3. The mass murderer and Fjordman has been in contact with eachother via email; a known fact to the police, although they have no way to know the extent of this contact
4. Fjordman has himself suggested to take “appropriate measures”, in spite of never saying what these “appropriate measures” are.
5. The terrorist brags that he is a members of organisation and talks of other cells in several countries

And you think that the police should not have searched Fjordman’s apartment, or that they should not be checking his electronic equipment? Really? That’s your argument?

No, Fjordman wasn’t treated like a murder suspect. He was treated as someone pointed at as the main ideological inspiration by a mass murderer killing dozens of people, someone who also had been in contact with the mass murderer.

Tell me, would you be as lenient with Fjordman if his name was… say… Ayman Muhammed al-Bokhari?