re: #10 mikiesmoky2

Since my only goal is to educate, i.e., I don’t want to embarrass anyone, I will only offer the important part of the piece, which, apparently, some have missed:

Apparently, when our leadership has had to choose between performing normal and necessary governmental operations versus shifting wealth to the top 0.1%, they have opted for the latter, i.e., we can’t devote the same wealth to investments in infrastructure and give to the top 0.1%.

Is anyone awake?

mz

Maybe it’s being Californian where we do not under tax the upper 1% like the Feds do. And yet failed to maintain the infrastructure. We have the Buffet rule plus here after all. We soak the rich pretty good. The roads still suck.

latimes.com