re: #101 Daria Emmons

I think it’s intellectually dishonest to claim a historical figure thinks anything about modern issues- especially on matters of science, where the historical figure never had an opportunity to examine the evidence for themselves. This is no different than claiming Newton as a creationist. Of course he was- Darwin was well after Newton’s time.

I also think it’s logically fallacious. If the creationists had something of substance to bolster their position- they wouldn’t have to rely on putting words in the mouths of the dead.