re: #115 Mike Lamb

Can’t see it dragging out that long. They’d first need a TRO or preliminary injunction to preclude a response. They’ll probably get that based on the potential harm to the respective parties. The court would then need to set an evidentiary hearing on a permanent injunction, possibly combined with a trial on the merits. The ting is, though, this is largely an issue of law, rather than fact. There shouldn’t be a need for extensive discovery, and the issue could possibly be resolved on motion.

Good (I think). Sounds like DB wants to comply.