re: #116 Naso Tang

This is not an education forum for those too lazy to learn basic principles everywhere else.

If you want to learn here, read and keep your mouth shut until you think you know what you are talking about, and don’t bother to admit your ignorance. It is redundant.

Nice…I noticed you’re one of the people who voted negative against my gentle comment that Charles was too defensive and too dismissive. And yet…you can’t bring yourself to defend the fundamental premise of your position as brilliantly destroyed by Professor Lindzen. So I will post it again:

“The notion that complex climate “catastrophes” are simply a matter of the response of a single number, GATA, to a single forcing, CO2 (or solar forcing for that matter), represents a gigantic step backward in the science of climate.”

Charles went from “ignorant skeptic” to “enlightened believer”…and immediately adopted the overly-defensive bunker mentality that is so common among “believers”. The salient issue on this and all such threads is how much hysterics over-compensate for their flimsy house of cards with the arrogance of self-assumed certainty. In so doing…you debase “science” and put yourself squarely in the camp of anti-science.

I posted a SINGLE sentence from the world’s most important climate scientist. Not a single person addressed the issue. I’ve seen a herd mentality charging into the deep weeds of meaningless non-sequiturs. Not a single person has dared attempt to address Professor Lindzen’s brilliant point. If you can’t defend the central premise of your religion…all the mindless incantations of approved scripture means nothing.

Now…like the trained seals that you are…honk, clap and vote this comment “negative” (as if THAT proves…well…something…whatever…)