re: #100 Buck

You are wrong, they did prosecute. This investigation states that they had good reason to prosecute. Not only did they prosecute, but the DOJ got default convictions.

They had a credible witness (Bartle Bull) ready to testify.

Ignoring that the DOJ felt that there should have been a re-investigation AFTER the default conviction seems strange to me.

Not simple.

Bartle Bull certainly is credible- but he was the only one out of many who examined the facts of the case. Simply being a credible witness is not necessarily enough to prosecute a case.

To be clear, the two morons behaved stupidly and despicably and were in fact ordered to stay away from polling stations, as I recall. I have nothing good to say about them.

Nor do I have anything good to say about the guy who beats a DUI charge despite driving erratically all over the road and endangering others.