re: #119 Charles

This is nonsense - another exaggeration in a long line of exaggerations. I know you’d like to promote the idea that the tiny problems found thus far completely invalidate the IPCC’s work, but that’s beyond silly.

Well we disagree on this I suppose, but the list of serious errors now includes the Himalayan Glaciers, the Amazon, and Africa. All false data based upon non-peer reviewed science, all given with erroneous confidence levels. Numerous people, including strong advocates of Global Warming like the BBC and the Guardian are now demanding apologies and calling for Dr. Pachauri’s resignation and a shake up of the IPCC to reform it.