re: #113 Lidane

What it does is call his decisions into question for any cases he heard that would have impacted her employers in any way. It’s also sleazy as hell.

I don’t see him being removed for this, but I’d expect fines and some sort of censure or punishment for it.

Has that ever happened where this info not being known by plaintiffs resulted in hearing cases that Thomas should have reasonably recused himself? If not, then there is nothing to question.