re: #126 Obdicut

Ugh. How did you get that out of what I wrote? Of course they’re trying to take albedo into account. But different models use different levels of cancellation from different sources. In other words, if you take the aerosol feedback/cancellation constant from Model A and plug it into Model B, Model B doesn’t predict very well anymore.

I’m just saying that when different models ascribe different values to what ought to be a constant, I’m left shaking my head. This isn’t Schrodinger’s cat…the cancellation constants can’t just be different from model to model because we think we’re observing something.

Would you mind lightening your tone? I’m trying to remain civil. Clearly I “want to be informed”. You are welcome to disagree…I won’t disparage your level of interest despite your disagreement. I wouldn’t be a long-time CJ sympathetic if i didn’t want to be informed on a great number of things.