re: #117 aurelius

I’ll say it again.

“”Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs.”

How clear is that, wingnuts? It doesn’t mean she is throwing out the 1st amendment. It simply means that she will decide the societal value of your speech.

Now STFU.

Which we already do with regards to protected speech. Those societal costs are measured with regards to fighting words, obscenity, incitement, threats, etc. This is especially true with regards to obscenity or pornography.