re: #7 tradewind

Okay, I understand the silliness. But where, exactly, does Bachmann call for a nuclear response? So far, I see her protesting that there is no possibility for one… which is not the same thing as advocating its use.

Isn’t that like saying “I’m not saying that you should eat chocolate, I’m just saying that you shouldn’t not be allowed to eat chocolate!” The double negative principle is working against her…