re: #116 PhillyPretzel

And the “revisions” are asking for references and are marked.

Yes, very interesting. I suppose an increase in revisions on a web page for a recently newsworthy subject is to be assumed. There seems to be some sticking to protocols by the ‘Wikipedians’ but I’m wondering if some partisans tried fudgering the narrative to cover for the Lady Mangler. I’d not be surprised in the least judging by the behavior of many other fans of hers.