re: #125 Charles

Dear Charles: - I don’t really give a damn who Milloy is, nor his site. Perhaps you didn’t catch my point. Do you have any cogent objections to his presentation of the state-of-art understandings of atmospheric physics? There’s nothing particularly arcane here (I could link you to such, if I had much hope of proper debate here, rather than, forgive me for saying it, ‘gossip and counter-gossip’), in what he’s presented.
If it is flawed in any meaningful way, not whether or not he ‘has an agenda’ (which of course he does!), than hold forth, please!?