re: #130 Destro

First, #94 was a great line.

What interpretation do you get from this article?

That Doug might have overstepped, and stepped into territory that he usually tries to avoid. So, it doesn’t get much of a blip on my significance-meter. I also suspect that he’s gotten quite a bit of flak along the lines of Sophia’s comment. He will live and be a better person as a result.

And disagreeing with it as you do is not an interpretation, it is a refutation.

Then you’d have to know my interpretation—which you did not know until I just wrote it, above. I’m letting it be a part of Doug’s life. Now, how are you going to read this as a refutation?

As I said way up above, the facts, the reality of Israel, does not fit your thesis.