re: #132 Spare O’Lake

Surely an organization like the NAACP is not entitled to hide behind its own shoddy practices and its own failure to afford Sherrod even the courtesy of a telephone call. At some point it could be fairly said that they knew or ought to have known that it was unfair to repeat the statement…especially where the source was not exactly what one would call mainstream and reliable.
No offense, Obdi, but are you an attorney or have you obtained a legal opinion from one? I’m curious as to how solid your characterization of the legal issue really is.

Wasn’t your argument one thread down that Brietbart couldn’t be charged with libel? Now you are saying that the NAACP should be? Just correct me if I’m reading this wrong…