re: #141 rieux

I like a good discussion as well as the next fellow, but when I find interlocutors descending to personal insults instead of discussion, that suggest to me that they are beyond the reach of reason, and I have a policy of ignoring them.

You said that you were ignorant of why Wahabbists would hate this place. That means you were coming from a position of ignorance. It’s not a personal insult, dude.

Thanks, but I don’t need you tell me about Wahhabism. For starters, you might learn to spell it correctly.

The ‘correct’ spelling is الوهابية.

If I don’t need to tell you about it, then why didn’t you know why the mosque would be hated by Wahabbists?

I’m afraid that that’s not the way the first amendment was taught when I was in law school - and first amendment jurisprudence has not changed on this issue since then. Since you’ve chosen to descend to insults rather than discussion, this is the last post of yours that I will respond to.

That’s nice. It doesn’t really have anything to do with your lack of an argument, I suppose.