re: #138 ausador

I am having a hard time parsing this…

[Embedded content]

Is she saying that all marriages should revert to being called civil unions until the people are re-married by a church?

Better yet, does she think it will be that easy to just substitute “civil union” in place of marriage in every law in the country?

Here’s a simpler idea: Just do away with all the government benefits tied to marriage and then it won’t matter whether you’re wed in a church or by a judge.