re: #16 Weaselone

I’m also very suspicious of Parnas. Unless what he says is backed up by corroborating evidence, I have doubts about it’s validity. I don’t doubt that he’s telling the truth about some things, but rather that he’s using verifiable truths to lend validity to fabrications.

Sort of like those letters that “proved” Bush did not attend his Air National Guard…true in substance but actually forgeries.