re: #150 silverdolphin

I fully expect the corrupt court to lie. Maybe say the President is not mentioned in Section 3 so he is exempt. That would be a lie because this exact question was asked during the Senate debates on the Amendment and the answer was that the President is covered under the officers clause. The President had been called an officer since the beginning of the Republic.

And these debates also show that the Section was not just about the Civil War. They actually removed anything that set a time limit. They knowingly wanted it to apply to any insurrectionist. So for the Court to use this excuse, they would have to lie.

So this is the lie I expect they will use. The amendmenrt says the unlawful acts would be that Trump “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same [the United States] , or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”

The Calvinball guys will just say he is not an insurrectionist and did not give aid or comfort. And this will be the lie that destroys the Court.

No. This will be the lie that destroys our nation. The media will not call the Court out on this. And Trump may indeed be elected. And that will be the end of us.