re: #67 lawhawk

It’s the so-called principled stand… They knew it was passing, but wanted to show displeasure over funding the boondoggle wall. That’s also even as they fund other aspects of govt to keep it from being shut down.

Strategically, not great.

Okay, that explains some of them, but Tim Scott?? Can’t find anything that explains his no vote—very uncharacteristic of his sycophantic ways.