re: #142 HebrewToYou

What’s wrong with mentioning out that LVQ continually resorts to hyperbole in order to make a point? I’ve read enough of Charles’ climate posts to have seen it on a consistent basis. Making reckless assumptions doesn’t help any argument. That’s a valid critique of the delivery of the argument; not of the argument itself.

Bullshit. Claiming he has a “weak and unsubstantiated” understanding of the science is not speaking to his delivery and is most assuredly wrong if you’ve bothered to read any of his links. Which, I’m guessing, you haven’t.