re: #153 chunkymonkey

Aren’t you clever.

re: #151 Obdicut

I was writing colloquially, not scientifically. I think the point of what I wrote was obvious. Good for you for being a dick about it.

If your point was so obvious, how come you can’t explain it given repeated tries?

Again, you said someone could be 100% genetically Swedish. You haven’t been able to explain what genetically Swedish means, except to say that it’s ‘ancestry’— which makes very little sense— or ‘appearance’— which is more ridiculous, since appearance is genetic, is obviously dumb otherwise.

Again: If your point is so obvious, just restate what you meant. You’ve been unable to, so far, in any way that didn’t just make your argument more tangled.