re: #144 LudwigVanQuixote

He is taking a very specific form of denier troll stance. He is playing himself up as a “concern troll.”

He is concerned that the scientists are sloppy in their work, and he will tell us how to make it better and do our jobs right “for the sake of the science.” In the mean time of course is the accusation that we are doing our jobs wrong and the false notion that he knows better.

It’s a very backhanded form of trolling.

If he really cared about honesty or the science for instance, he might have thought to mention what bringing the news of the retraction means.

The retraction of that article means that the authors were forced to concede that the IPCC report was low ball.

If Walter cared for the science, and was not being a troll, then why did he forget to mention that?

this is all nonsense…and rude