re: #157 Buck

Chris Van Hollen, the top Democrat on the Budget Committee. Surprised?

I could start to debate you on this bill, but I really think it is way off topic. Maybe we should create a separate page just for that. Then you could throw your links that demonize republicans at me, and I could throw an equal number of links that talk about how in any case medicare will have to be reformed, as will other entitlements.

Sometimes you have to change things in order to save them.

All I’m trying to do is prove why limiting the government spending to the ratio it was at in 1966 is going to inevitably raise the cost of social security.

If you don’t care to believe that, its fine, but don’t say its not related to the topic.

I’m showing why what Schultz said was not a mater of “faith” but of “fact”.

Image: spending_cap_charticle_graphic.jpg