re: #104 Bagua

It is true the amounts spent are not equivalent.

Pro-AGW is a multi-billion dollar industry.

Anti-AGW has funding in the millions, not billions, and much of it is done by bloggers and journalists for little or no money.

Not even close to equivalent.

Gee that stung, nine -1 dings. Can anyone dispute the factual basis of this statement, or is this just and inconvenient truth?