re: #159 jaunte

I’m pointing out to you that you must have some new science to replace the current theory with, not just handwaving and objections.

Other creationists have spoken about Biblical “kinds” of animals, but remain notably vague on when something stops being one kind and becomes another. Maybe you have an idea about that.

And I’m saying you don’t, because expecting a “better theory” means that the wrong stuff just hangs around that much longer. That is not good science at all. This is the same kind of thinking that got AGW to where it is now - several generations were not trained in critical thinking, but only to believe the ‘consensus’ and everything that they were taught by their ‘betters’.