re: #160 RogueOne

But science means we’re continually learning new things, so your view would mean that it was precisely those areas that we studied the most that we would be able to say the least about. That makes no sense.

The only way to prove “A” is the cause is to prove that the other variables “b”, “c”, and “d” can’t be the cause.

No, it’s not. It doesn’t stop at D— that’s an infinite set of other possible causes.

Have you read any of the sites that Charles links regularly on this subject, like skepticalscience.com or realclimate.org?