re: #165 Coracle

Hogwash. The inclusion of the adjective “forced” in the language of the bill invites differentiation. It invites people to claim “well that case wasn’t ‘forced’ rape”. To pretend that won’t happen very quickly after such a law passed is disingenuous.

Well that is your opinion. Mine is different and is based on actually reading the bill. I would like to read the bill that is existing to see if the word was added.

However, as it is not in the Section title, AND the definition of rape does not include non-forced, AND as no one has been able to give an example of rape that would not be classified as forced. Also the use of commas in the line is clear to show that it would include all incest, all minors and all rape. (plus the health of the mother).

Again, based on actually reading the bill as it is now.