Continuation…

People are using (consciously or unconsously) AGW to either reduce pollution (I’m in favor of less pollution) OR to gain control of economies/people in order to gain more power or wealth (I’m not in favor of that). To use CO2 as a ruse, because CO2 is so common in industrialized nations, so easy to target. And many scientists have pointed out that their funding requests get fast tracked if they include in their proposal a link to AGW. Whether or not they feel the link is real. They put it in their proposals for muscle. Who’d want to refuse funding to save the planet?

Scientific theories, and that is what AGW is, can only become the accepted mainstream theory only after is stands up to rigorous review and all other theories resoundly defeated. We have Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. And it will always be the main, accepted Theory, until another comes along with more information, better mathematics, to disprove Einstein and prove their theory. The main theory of AGW is not the reigning champ, it has not defeated the other theories. We just have a collection of people saying that their theory is better that the others. But when you ask for the specific data, the models that calculated the results, the AGW Deniers are rebuffed and scoffed at. They are not smart enough to interpret the modeling, or else it’s proprietary. Just look to how they treat Steve McIntire. But look at his results and the data he collect without their data. They’ve even had to retract some info based on his observations.

Sorry all, their research DOES NOT stand up to scrutiny. These e-mails indicate that they are fabricating data, deleting data and conspiring in refusing to respond to FOI requests. I’m not saying that all of their data is forged, but this release of information shows that their research needs a thorough review. Their correspondences and actions show that they do not have the faith in their data and research to stand in the light of review. So they must have other motives, rather than a pure scientific mentality to the position they pose.

There should be much ado about something.

IMHO…