re: #161 harrisam

2 levels of deniers
1) denying that Global Warming is even happening
(by your 1st sentence, with the “IF” preceding it, i take it you do deny it
2) agreeing that warming is happening but denying that mankind has anything to do with it

(1)I should have put in “and I do” after the word theory in my original post.
(2)Never realized that qualifies me as a “denier”. Very strict rules you have there. I also object to the choice of the word “denier” debate since it, I believe purposely, ties the argument to the Holocaust. An unfair & over the top association.

I see. So unless the discussion is specifically about the Holocaust, one can forevermore not use the word DENIER!?

That stated, to lump all ‘deniers’ into one pot is incorrect, imho. I think there are flat out deniers (damn, theres that word) (those who say there is no warming as well as those that deny (damn there’s that word AGAIN) that man has anything to do with it

I think theres a 3rd set of people. They acknowledge that the earth IS warming and that man DOES it,BUT

A) they are skeptical as to what degree man causes it
and
B) they are skeptical about the dire predictions, like Kansas City will be ocean front in a decade