re: #169 Anymouse 🌹🏡😷

I stand by the constitutional (not moral) argument I offered in my controversial oped: if a 16 year old has the constitutional right to have an abortion without state or parental interference, how could she not have the constitutional right to engage in consensual sex? 1/

So he is abandoning morality for an abstract Constitutional argument…to defend a serial child molester.

Impregnating a teenage girl as an adult is a clear case of statutory rape, but one does not have to be over 18 to get another teenager pregnant.

His argument is unworthy of anyone who calls himself “intellectual”