re: #162 Cato the Elder

My ding was for the crass generalization. I was unaware of a Dem platform point that required contempt for the Constitution. Had the comment focused merely on the specific individuals in question, I would have bypassed it.

That’s just my taste, though — I get really annoyed with partisan-flavored generalizations. And I tend to downding what I perceive as unoriginal recyclings of other peoples’ words. Original, thoughtful takes get my respect, regardless of my position.

(And just to be clear - partisan-flavored ice creams aren’t too good, either. Unless you get the sprinkles.)