re: #171 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

There’s nothing difficult to understand in the statement, “he’s not a fundamentalist Christian.” What’s the problem in saying so?

I guess we are back to the semantics of “fundamentalist”. To me it means a lack of logic in interpretations of holy scriptures, tantamount to literal interpretations of scriptures (when it is convenient).

What does it mean to you?