re: #177 AntonSirius

but another NYT piece which says that our intelligence services now believe “a group of extremists… took advantage of a situation”, and which is supported by accounts of Petraeus’ testimony to Congress, isn’t cause to revise or at least re-consider your opinion of what might have happened?

I don’t get why you think that Charles or anyone else doesn’t think that a group of extremists took advantage of the situation. It’s not mutually exclusive to the video being the motivator, is it?