re: #185 jamesfirecat

Once again, that is not the bill in front of the SCOTUS. You can play what ifs all you want, but it is not an argument for the Mandate as it was written, voted on, and signed by the President.

Do you understand that the Supreme Court thought that this was worthy of their time? That it clearly is not cut and dried as you make it seem? That there are people with experience and education that see it as unclear?

You might think that the Supreme Court are part of some anti Obama conspiracy, but I assure you they are not. This is the backstop for laws that are in question as to their Constitutionality.