re: #1 klys

Apparently (and this is not on you but on Wired), links to the actual paper are overrated.

Which means I am still left with a whole lot of unanswered questions regarding methodology, assumptions, and once again have the conclusion that the majority of science journalism sucks.

Thanks, I guess all we can do is await further work. Honestly i’d be surprised if this were really in error rather than a debate about how far this has gone.