freetoken,

“Lying”? Good Grief.

Your comment is a typical warmist attack, intimidation and personal attacks, not a refutation of any of Professor Carter’s very reasoned arguments.

It is well known that “publishing through the peer review process” anything that questions the Global Warming dogma is all but impossible, the papers are rejected and the authors subject to vilification, by contrast, the Global Warming industry is funded to the tune of billions of dollars.

If a scientist studies, say, the reproductive activities of a certain snail, funding is problematic, adding to the study proposal the key words “the effect of global warming on the reproduction of snails” results in access to a liquid stream of untold millions dedicated to supporting the Global Warming dogma, and a ready avenue to publication. As a result, science is unbalanced with countless such studies.