This part I agree with:

he rejects not the theory of evolution, but arguments that use Darwin’s ideas to disprove the existence of a creator-God.

I have yet to see a scientific argument against the existence of G-d; I have only seen philosophic and metaphysical arguments.

Unfortunately, just as some religious people use incomplete parts of scientific evidence and theories to say that science cannot explain Creation, some scientists use these non-scientific arguments as “proof” that G-d doesn’t exist.

Both sides, to me, are letting their beliefs cloud their judgment.