Comment

Scientific Review Shows 'Unambiguous' Evidence of Global Warming

200
garhighway3/04/2010 4:46:50 pm PST

re: #189 Walter L. Newton

No I can’t, since the scientist at the IPCC admitted themselves that there are uncertainly issues in regards to future predictions. So I don’t suspect the problem, but I do suspect certain hyperbole made without scientific evidence.

What level of certainty do you need to think AGW is a big enough problem that we need to address it?

Or put the other way, how much uncertainty can you tolerate?

For my money, I don’t need to know the precise body count at any particular point in the future to be convinced that AGW is a very bad thing that we need to address.